“Customers would love to be able to see something labelled by a bank as sustainable across the product suite,” says Sally Robinson, Head of Guarantees, ANZ. “But that’s going to take time as banks and third-party agencies get comfortable with how we classify that trade flow or that corporate as sustainable. But who determines that, and who’s on the hook for that decision?”
Resolving this requires agencies and governments drafting taxonomies to clarify issues – which itself highlights another gap: a lack of standardisation when it comes to taxonomies and requirements across different markets, says Devidas. He points out that standardisation was crucial when digitising trade to boost cross-border and domestic trade, as was cooperation between agencies and government. It is no less important here.
That brings us to the second factor: the impact of technology, including AI, machine learning and data analytics, in scaling up sustainable and supply chain finance. When it comes to moving away from paper-based trading systems, for instance, nations like Sweden and Singapore are far ahead. Singapore, for example, is on its sixth version of a single trading window. Many countries, by comparison, lack even an initial digital window.
Success requires a push by regulators, as is underway in Australia, says Simone Fynmore, Head of Trade & Supply Chain Sales, Victoria, ANZ. The federal government is supporting corporations and industries to make progress in their technology journey.